Reimagining governance: If the future had a board, purpose would be the chair

Reimagining governance: If the future had a board, purpose would be the chair
There’s growing recognition that our governance systems — in business, government and civil society — are not built for the complexity, urgency or interconnectedness of today’s world. But recognition isn’t enough. If we want economies that are more innovative, inclusive and sustainable, we must rewire how value is created — and how it’s governed.
Governance isn’t just a Boardroom issue
Governance has long been framed as risk management and regulatory hygiene. But in a world reshaped by climate shocks, AI disruption, geopolitical volatility and public distrust, that framing is obsolete. Governance must evolve — from control to contribution.
Here in Aotearoa New Zealand, we often speak of our agility, transparency and fairness. Yet many of our institutions still operate with static, siloed systems. Boards focused narrowly on short-term returns. Public agencies locked into linear planning cycles. Stakeholder engagement that’s more performative than participatory. What if we designed our organisations — companies, councils, ministries, co-ops — around a core purpose? A clear, actionable Single Organizing Idea (SOI) that unites decision-making, strategy and culture across silos. A shared north star that governs for long-term contribution, beyond quarterly compliance and political cycles.
This isn’t a utopian vision — it’s a governance design challenge. One that’s gaining traction globally, with new frameworks, metrics and standards reframing how organisations define success and legitimacy in a world that demands more.
Innovation is structural, not just technological
True innovation isn’t just about product breakthroughs or digital tools — it’s about rethinking the systems that allow innovation to flourish. That includes how boards function, how decisions are made, and how responsibility is shared.
Spencer Stuart’s Closing the Confidence Gap report makes this clear: Fewer than 1 in 4 CEOs believe their boards are providing the support they need to lead through rapid change. And while Directors believe they are offering the right mix of oversight and expertise, CEOs disagree — citing a lack of strategic partnership, contextual knowledge and space for honest, forward-looking dialogue.
In short: We have a perception gap. And it’s undermining innovation.
Give purpose a seat at the table
If we want governance to shape better futures, it must move beyond generic ESG rhetoric and into the real levers of power — charters, KPIs and reporting.
1. Board charters with purpose clauses
Purpose belongs in the board charter, alongside fiduciary and financial responsibilities. A simple clause can shift mindsets:
“The Board is responsible for ensuring that the company’s purpose acts as the guiding principle for all strategic and operational decision-making. The Board must also ensure that performance is evaluated not solely on financial outcomes, but on the company’s societal, environmental and stakeholder impact as aligned with this purpose.”
This turns purpose from a campaign into a commitment — and invites directors to steward it, not just sign it off.
2. Executive KPIs that reflect purpose
Boards have the power to reshape executive performance metrics. Tying bonuses and reviews to purpose-aligned outcomes sends a powerful signal that impact matters. It shifts incentives from short-termism to long-term contribution — exactly what our times demand.
3. Annual reporting that builds trust
Annual reports are often dense with data, yet light on meaning. Including a “Purpose in Action” section — with impact metrics, narrative context and even third-party assurance — builds stakeholder confidence and avoids purpose-washing.
In each case, the goal is the same: Turn purpose from positioning into practice.
Governance is where the future gets shaped
Yes, transforming governance is difficult. But the momentum is real. International standards are evolving, and across sectors, a new generation of leaders is demanding purpose — not as a slogan, but as a benchmark of legitimacy and progress.
New Zealand has a generational opportunity to lead here. To move from “clean and green” slogans to meaningful governance that shapes a regenerative, inclusive economy.
Because the future doesn’t just arrive. It’s governed into being.
White Paper: Beyond the Fern: Why purpose, not just provenance, sells New Zealand to the World

Beyond the Fern: Why purpose, not just provenance, sells New Zealand to the World
By Neil Gaught and Lance Sheppard
Why vision alone no longer cuts it

Why vision alone no longer cuts it
We’ve all heard it before: “What this organisation needs is a bold vision.” But in 2025, that’s no longer enough. Vision might inspire a moment. Purpose sustains a movement.
This week, John Wadsworth and I have published a new NG&A white paper — Leading with Purpose: Why today’s leaders need more than vision. It’s a practical response to a question we’re hearing more and more often: What does leadership look like in a world where complexity, uncertainty and scrutiny are all on the rise?
The short answer? It looks very different from the leadership of old.
Today, leaders are not judged solely by their ability to deliver results. They are judged by how they deliver them — with what intent, what impact and who they bring along the way. What matters is clarity of purpose, adaptability and trust.
That’s the through-line of the paper: Leadership is evolving. And so must we.
In it, we argue that the best leaders today aren’t those with all the answers. They’re the ones who ask the right questions, empower others to act and create the conditions where purpose becomes more than words on a wall. They don’t simply lead for results — they lead for relevance.
We draw on examples from Aotearoa— from Kiwibank to Fisher & Paykel Healthcare — to show what this looks like in practice. These are organisations where purpose isn’t performative. It’s structural. It shapes governance, strategy and decision-making, giving people a clear direction and the confidence to act.
Importantly, the paper also explores how the Single Organizing Idea (SOI®) framework — developed over two decades and applied in dozens of boardrooms — enables leaders to embed purpose deeply and durably. It’s not a branding exercise. It’s a governance shift.
In an era where employee engagement, stakeholder trust and strategic clarity can no longer be taken for granted, this matters. Purpose is no longer a ‘nice-to-have’. It’s the clearest competitive advantage there is.
If you’re a leader wondering how to navigate ambiguity, align your people, or lead change that lasts — this paper is for you.
Read the full white paper here: https://neilgaught.com/leading-with-purpose-why-todays-leaders-need-more-than-vision/
White Paper: Leading with Purpose: Why today’s leaders need more than vision

Leading with Purpose: Why today’s leaders need more than vision
By Neil Gaught and John Wadsworth
A new dawn for NZ business? Now’s the time to lead with purpose

A new dawn for NZ business? Now’s the time to lead with purpose
It’s encouraging to see that optimism is returning to the New Zealand business community. According to 2degrees’ latest Shaping Business Study — featured in New Zealand Management last week — business confidence is at its highest since 2021, with productivity up and a growing appetite for innovation and growth.
This isn’t just a mood shift—it’s a moment of opportunity.
The report highlights a number of positive trends:
- Nearly half of NZ business leaders feel more optimistic about the future than they did a year ago
- AI is beginning to deliver real value in productivity and efficiency gains
- More businesses are prioritising growth over maintenance.
It’s clear that leaders are readying themselves to move beyond survival mode. But optimism alone won’t deliver impact. What’s needed now is direction — and that’s where purpose becomes critical.
Because the world’s most progressive and competitive businesses aren’t just embracing purpose — they’re being driven by it. Not as a brand veneer or a box-ticking exercise in sustainability messaging, but as a strategic, unifying idea that benefits all stakeholders: customers, employees, communities and shareholders alike.
Purpose, when properly embedded, is not about lofty words or feel-good campaigns. It’s about capitalising on the direction of travel. It’s about resisting the headline-chasing clickbait that says people have stopped caring—because they haven’t. The demand for meaningful, values-aligned action is real and growing.
In this new era of productivity and growth, purpose gives New Zealand businesses a competitive advantage. It brings coherence to decision-making, energy to teams and credibility to markets increasingly shaped by transparency, trust and accountability.
So while business confidence is on the rise, let’s not waste this window.
Let’s use it to make sharper decisions—ones grounded in common sense, not just commentary. Because the businesses that succeed in the years ahead will be those that understand what their customers, employees, and communities actually expect—and then deliver on it.
Not just returns. Not just pay checks. But value that’s meaningful, visible and enduring.
Purpose is how you meet — and exceed — those expectations. It’s how you stay competitive in a world that’s watching more closely, choosing more carefully and rewarding those who lead with a thoughtful and principled approach.
Let’s make sure New Zealand businesses don’t just catch up — they get ahead.
Because the future belongs to those who know why they’re in business — and who act on it.
Book Review: Less

Book review: A tailor’s manifesto for mending more than just our clothes
In a world brimming with excess, Patrick Grant’s Less: Stop Buying So Much Rubbish – How Having Fewer, Better Things Can Make Us Happier is a crisply tailored takedown of modern consumerism. Best known as a judge on The Great British Sewing Bee and the man behind the revival of Savile Row stalwart Norton & Sons, Grant has long used his public profile to thread together questions of style, sustainability and social value.
With Less, he cuts through the marketing noise of fast fashion and cheap convenience, arguing instead for a revival of dignity—in clothing, in craft, and in community. At the heart of his argument is a simple but deeply unfashionable truth: that owning fewer, better-made things is not a sacrifice but a route to personal and collective well-being.
I didn’t read Less in the traditional sense—I listened to it on the bus and on wet Auckland walks that reminded me of the rainy Pembrokeshire days when I first met Patrick at BFest, a three-day gathering of the then newly formed UK B Corp community back in 2016. It was there that I first heard him speak with passion about Community Clothing, the social enterprise he had just launched. What stuck with me wasn’t only the clarity of his argument about the need for a better way forward for his industry—it was the pride he clearly had in describing the people, processes and places behind every garment his fledgling business was making.
That sense of pride stayed with me when, on a trip back to my hometown of Burnley—just down the road from local football rivals Blackburn—I visited Community Clothing’s factory there. Cookson & Clegg, established in 1860, had seen better days before being revived under Patrick’s leadership. Touring the floor with Dave O’Kane, the factory’s Technical Development Manager, it was clear that this was more than a business—Patrick had created, or maybe reignited, a real sense of purpose—built on skill, history, and hope.
Community Clothing exemplifies a business with purpose stitched into its very DNA. It harnesses underused UK manufacturing capacity to create affordable, high-quality wardrobe staples—an antidote to fast fashion in every respect. It supports skilled jobs, revitalises local economies, and offers a deeply human counterpoint to the disposable culture that dominates modern retail.
What sets Less apart from the usual decluttering literature is its sheer ambition. This is not just a call to simplify but a call to rebalance. Backed with meticulous research, Grant takes aim at inequality, industrial decline, and the soul-sapping effects of algorithm-driven, faster-and-faster consumption. His voice—by turns exasperated, warm, and gently persuasive—echoes the quiet wisdom that doing less, but better, might just be the most radical act of all.
Less is not a branding exercise; it’s a deeply argued philosophy for living and working better—offering substance in a sector too often distracted by overpaid influencers and synthetic imagery.
The audio edition includes a PDF of a lecture Grant gave at the Royal Geographical Society. It’s well worth a read. In it, he outlines a radical reimagining of the clothing economy—redistributing value to makers, replacing high-volume consumption with local, circular models, and building more fulfilling jobs across the lifecycle of garments. It’s a compelling vision of a sector rebuilt around values, not just value.
The book is not without its seams. At times, its polemical tone flirts with nostalgia, and readers seeking detailed policy design may find the arguments more moral than material. But these are minor quibbles in an otherwise sharply observed and urgently necessary book.
In the end, Less is not just about buying fewer clothes. It’s about building a life and an economy that is more intentional, more inclusive, and more human. For those of us who believe—as I do—that business must do more than turn a profit and sprinkle charity on top, Grant’s message is a well-measured fit with the wider argument for purpose-led enterprise.
In CORE, I tell the story of walking that Blackburn factory floor with Dave, then phoning Patrick and his then-CEO Lucy Clayton that same evening to share an observation: it was pride, I felt, that seemed to drive everything. Patrick agreed. But perhaps—nine years on—it’s something even more elemental that has threaded all the parts of his enterprise together. Perhaps the more powerful unifying idea is, quite simply, less.
The changing climate of leadership: Part 2

Part Two: Leading through the storm: Five traits of successful business leadership in an era of radical change
In Part One, I explored why the climate of business leadership is shifting — and why courage, clarity and a deep commitment to long-term value are no longer optional. In this second part, I want to focus on what that leadership actually looks like. Here are five traits that I believe will define the most effective — and trusted — leaders in the years ahead.”
1. The best leaders don’t have all the answers — but they ask better questions.
Running a business of any size against today’s backdrop of climate, sustainability and social challenges is anything but simple. It’s certainly not business as usual — and hasn’t been for some time. But rather than burying their heads in the sand, smart leaders are leaning into the complexity. They’re recognising the opportunities it presents, embracing new thinking, building diverse ‘teams of teams’ — unified by a common purpose — that challenge outdated business models and unlock exciting new ways forward.
2. Values are your compass. Purpose is your North Star.
Embedding purpose into governance and operations is crucial. The Single Organizing Idea (SOI®) framework I developed helps organisations align ambition with action. When a business knows what it stands for — not just what it sells — decisions become clearer and more consistent, even amid uncertainty.
3. Diversity isn’t just good practice — it’s good leadership.
Leadership in many organisations still lacks true diversity — of background, experience, age and worldview. When the same voices stay around the table for too long, even with the best intentions, blind spots form and innovation stalls. Embracing fresh perspectives and lived experiences leads to better decisions, stronger cultures and renewed trust. It also signals a serious commitment to equity and inclusion — values that research shows matter more than ever to employees, investors and society at large.
4. Courage and care go hand in hand.
Leading with care — for people, communities and the planet — requires courage. It means prioritising long-term impact over short-term gains and making difficult decisions that align with core values.
5. In the age of AI, human leadership matters more than ever.
While AI can optimise processes, it cannot replace human judgment, empathy, and ethical decision-making. Leaders must integrate technology thoughtfully, ensuring it serves the organisation’s purpose and enhances human capabilities.
Join the Conversation
I’ll be sharing more on these themes in a special online session hosted by my friends at PURE during London Climate Action Week. If you’re a business leader, strategist, or change-maker looking to put purpose at the centre of climate action, I hope to see you there.
Let’s reimagine the climate of business leadership — before the forecast gets worse.
Date: Tuesday 24 June
Time: 9:00am BST
Topic: Climate Action: The Role of Business Leadership
Where: Online, hosted by PURE Value 360
[Link to follow]
The changing climate of leadership: Part 1

Part One: The changing climate of leadership: Why courage, clarity and purpose matter more than ever
“Management is doing things right;
leadership is doing the right things.”
— Peter Drucker
Doing the right things has never felt more urgent — or more complex. As we confront a worsening climate crisis, exponential technological change and growing distrust in institutions, the kind of leadership we need isn’t defined by title or charisma. It’s defined by courage, clarity and a deep commitment to long-term value — not just for shareholders, but for society. That kind of leadership can no longer be defined as unusual — it’s now essential.
Around the world, we’re witnessing a rise in short-termism — often fuelled by political polarisation, populist rhetoric and power plays dressed up as strategy. Too many leaders are pursuing near-term advantage at the expense of long-term resilience. The consequences are already evident: Eroded trust, divided societies and a lack of coordinated action on undeniable issues set out in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that demand global cooperation.
Against this backdrop, business leaders can — and must — step up. According to GlobeScan’s 2025 report, 71% of Americans believe CEOs should speak out about the importance of addressing climate change, and 67% say CEOs should publicly defend diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. This support spans political and generational lines — a clear signal that society increasingly expects business to lead where others are falling short.
There’s a competitive dimension too: The most admired and resilient businesses today are those that are actively engaging — not just through CSR or branding, but through their core purpose. They’re embedding sustainability and social impact into how they govern, operate and grow their businesses — and they’re reaping the rewards in talent attraction, customer loyalty, innovation and long-term performance.
Business leadership today requires more than operational excellence; it demands a steadfast commitment to values that endure beyond election cycles and quarterly earnings. Over the past two decades, I’ve seen that the most successful — the most effective and most admired leaders — are those who align their organisation’s purpose not only with their commercial objectives but also with the needs of the societies they serve and are a critical part of.
In next week’s follow-up, I’ll explore what courageous, purpose-led business leadership actually looks like in practice — from building diverse ‘teams of teams’ to navigating the ethical use of AI. These are the principles I’ll also be unpacking during London Climate Action Week, where I’ll be speaking at a live online session arranged and hosted by my friends at PURE Value 360.
Date: Tuesday 24 June
Time: 9:00am BST
Topic: Climate Action: The Role of Business Leadership
Where: Online, hosted by PURE Value 360
[Link to follow]
When is “She’ll be right” not alright?

When is “She’ll be right” not alright?
In New Zealand’s business circles, I’ve noticed something that’s simultaneously both refreshing and, at times, a little risky: A culture of radical informality. Some people show up to business events dressed for a BBQ. They speak with a directness that would raise eyebrows in other parts of the world — the F-word and even the C-word flow as freely as a morning Flat White.
This informality is often worn as a badge of authenticity. It reflects a certain honesty and a no-nonsense attitude that’s part of New Zealand’s DNA. It’s the mark of a culture that values plain speaking over corporate jargon and personal relationships over rigid hierarchies. In a country as small and interconnected as ours, that directness can cut through bureaucracy and build trust quickly. There’s a refreshing clarity in not putting on airs or relying on carefully rehearsed scripts. But it also raises a question: How does this culture of informality shape how leaders show up — and how their purpose, and the purpose of their organisations, is perceived?
The recent move by Christopher Luxon’s government to ban gang patches in public places is a vivid reminder that symbols matter. These patches aren’t just scraps of fabric; they’re powerful markers of affiliation and influence. They project a certain identity and claim a kind of social territory — whether that territory is real or reputational. The ban itself speaks to the power of these symbols to shape perceptions and, ultimately, behaviour. It’s a lesson for all of us about the signals we send — and the influence they hold.
In the world of business, leaders have their own versions of these symbols. It might be the clothes they choose to wear to a meeting, the language they use in an email, or the stories they tell to demonstrate the authenticity of their company’s purpose. These small, everyday choices are what build — or erode — trust.
We’ve seen it play out recently at the highest levels of leadership. In a city that many aspire to see as “world-class,” the choice of words — especially when laced with expletives — isn’t just a slip of the tongue. It becomes part of the leader’s brand. It signals not just what they’re about, but what they think the city stands for. Just as a gang patch can send a message of power and defiance, a leader’s careless language can send a message of indifference or disrespect — whether intended or not.
In my first book, I wrote about Gerald Ratner, the British businessman who famously described his own products as “total crap” — a throwaway line at a business dinner in 1991 that instantly wiped £500 million (NZ$1.13 billion today) from his company’s value and pretty much ended his career. It’s a cautionary tale that underlines a simple truth: In leadership, how we present ourselves — the signals we send — matters. Because leadership is influence, and in a small, diverse, multicultural society like ours, that influence is often amplified.
Where many voices and perspectives meet, the symbols we choose to adopt — and the standards we set — take on even more significance. And when the leader’s personal brand overshadows the organisation’s purpose, it risks getting lost — or at least diluted. Because purpose isn’t just a line in a corporate statement or a nod to a trend. It’s the measure of how we show up in the room, how we respect the people we work with, and how we balance the commercial and social roles many people expect from businesses and organisations today.
“She’ll be right” absolutely has its place in this country’s culture — a certain resilience, an ability to keep perspective. But when it comes to leading an organisation with a purpose, “she’ll be right” can be a dangerous shortcut. Because leading an organisation that stands for something bigger than itself requires more than optimism — it demands clarity, intention, and a willingness to hold ourselves to a higher standard. Because in the end, “good enough” is never enough for leaders who want to build businesses that endure.
So yes, the way we show up — from the words we use to the presence we bring — matters. Because in business, as in life, how you show up is how you’re remembered.
Budget Week Reminder: Strategy First, Spending Second

Budget Week reminder: Vision first, spending second
This week, all eyes are on the numbers in New Zealand.
As the Government prepares to announce the national budget, it’s a timely reminder for business leaders — both large and small — that the discipline of budgeting only makes sense if you first know what you’re trying to achieve. A budget is not a vision. And it’s certainly not a strategy.
It’s a tool.
The challenge governments face is the same one facing many businesses: Every line item has a lobbying constituency. Defence or education? Infrastructure or mental health? Climate adaptation or economic productivity? The answer, unfortunately, is always “yes.” But “yes” without alignment is how we end up with ballooning costs and underwhelming results.
Everything costs. So what counts?
In business — as in government — trying to make everyone happy leads to incoherence. You end up managing money instead of managing progress. That’s why purpose, when used properly, is a vital financial management tool.
As Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, reminded shareholders: “Purpose is not the sole pursuit of profits but the animating force for achieving them.” When purpose is clearly articulated and embedded, it helps leaders make tough calls — not based on popularity or proximity, but on alignment.
This is where governance comes in. Businesses need a system — not a slogan — that enables purpose to live at the heart of decision-making. One that links purpose with operations, brand and investment priorities. When leaders adopt such a unifying framework, it becomes much easier to make confident financial choices. Not because everything is easy — but because everything is intentional.
If it’s not aligned, why fund it?
In my work with clients around the world, I’ve often found that 15–25% of internal expenditure — marketing budgets, ESG reporting, even product innovation — is misaligned with the business’s real direction of travel. Not maliciously. Just habitually. Without a Single Organizing Idea (SOI) to challenge assumptions, budgets become backwards-looking. They reward inertia, not intention.
That’s why investment in strategy isn’t a one-off exercise. It’s a system. Like the public purse, your business needs an active feedback loop between ambition, allocation and accountability.
And that requires more than values on the wall. It requires a governance mindset—one that ensures your vision isn’t just visible, but viable. A shared understanding that helps boards and leadership teams ask: Does this decision move us forward? If not, why are we investing in it?
Purpose is not a luxury — it’s the lens
Some might argue that in tight times, purpose must take a backseat. But as McKinsey has repeatedly shown, companies that integrate purpose into their core operations see stronger financial resilience and long-term returns. In fact, their recent global survey found that “companies with a strong sense of purpose outperform the market by 5–7% annually.”
In uncertain times, the best investment any business can make is in clarity. Clarity of vision. Clarity of governance. Clarity of spend.
Governments might struggle to balance the books — because everything and everyone needs something. But your business doesn’t have to. You get to choose. And with a coherent governance model that aligns strategy with purpose, you won’t just get through budget week — you’ll be positioned to thrive long after it.
So here’s the question: What’s guiding your decisions? And is your budget aligned with it?